Criticism: Straight talk on media, politics and public life

Want clear, sharp takes on what’s going wrong — and why — in Indian news and politics? This tag brings together pieces that question the way stories are told, decisions are made, and power is used. You’ll find quick verdicts, pointed questions, and practical ideas for change rather than long-winded essays.

Look here for two types of posts: short, punchy critiques that call out a single issue, and deeper looks that trace how a problem grew. For example, we have posts asking what news channels should stop doing and why many run masala news instead of serious reporting. We also host articles that point fingers at political playbooks and accountability gaps — like debates over whether institutions can still audit after big private takeovers.

What to expect from these pieces

Expect plain language, specific examples, and clear targets. When a post criticises news channels, it names the habits — sensational headlines, overused "breaking news" alerts, or the blame game — and suggests what editors could change. When the target is a politician or policy, the articles list the actions that matter: decisions, conflicts, or outcomes that affect people’s lives.

Here are the common threads you’ll see: media ethics (who profits from a story), accountability (who checks powerful players), and social impact (how coverage shapes public opinion). We don’t treat every critique the same — some are opinionated, some are investigative. Read the snippet to know which is which.

How to use this tag

Start with the short pieces if you want a quick take: items like "What should all the Indian news channels stop doing?" and "Why do many Indian news channels show only masala news?" give fast, useful reads. Move to longer posts for context: articles about audit powers, honest news anchors, or the politics around a leader explain the bigger picture.

If you care about practical change, look for posts that end with clear steps — for editors, regulators, or readers. For example, pieces on media bias often recommend simple fixes like stricter labeling of opinion, fewer alarmist tags, and more fact-checking on air. Political critiques tend to call for transparency, better oversight, or public debate.

Want to join the conversation? Read, comment, and share your view. Tell us which critiques hit the mark and which miss. This tag is for readers who want accountability, not noise. If a story raises more questions than answers, that’s a good start — it means the discussion is still open.

Use the tag to keep an eye on recurring problems. Over time you’ll spot patterns: the same media habits, the same political moves, the same accountability gaps. That makes it easier to know where attention can really make a difference.

Keep checking back — new posts appear as issues heat up. If you prefer, sort by newest or most discussed to follow the debates that matter right now.